Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 replies - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Lesson 2: discussion question (post here for credit) #4746

    Very interesting topics, I have never been involved with stakeholders engagements before but I think, lack of communication with research teams, implementer, and sponsors creates less interest towards research or trials. Failure in commitments, selfishness, non transparent environments at study site, less knowledge about study,  lack of sufficient funding in research creates stakeholder’s mind to join to another trial site or forum and failure of our research. Faith, respect, money, knowledge about research , dedicated research team, honesty, transparency, and most important is respectful communications will make meaningful stakeholder engagements.

     

    I agree with Fanele. Bio metric fingerprint system is helpful in Co-enrollment problem.

    I agree with all your comments. I admit here in my institutions we all having limited knowledge about GPP.  After hearing and understanding the guidelines of GPP, I got that we were  following GCP. GPP and GCP both are different things.  From lesson 1  I got idea that sponsors should be encourage for the adoptions of GPP guideline. Personally I believes the GPP guideline is very important, and assure that after completions of this course, lots of things change we will engage the stakeholder Not recruit.

    Mahesh

    in reply to: Study participant retention in community engaement #4533

    Dear colleagues,

    In my response good communication, knowledge about trial and  assurance about completion of  commitment will enhance ability and desire of participants to stay enrolled in a trial.

    Mahesh

     

    in reply to: Community Represantation #4532

    Very nice topic,

    I agree with Bernice and Jessica that,  what you call it is not important but How the group work is important.

    Hello everyone

    Nice topic for discussion. I agree with Jorge that CAB should have its own rules and regulations, and their advice should be taken seriously.  CAB members should be trained, as well as their knowledge should be updated. In my opinion rules and regulations for CAB to advice based on transparency, and  ethics increase its functionality.

    Mahesh

    in reply to: Welcome! #4431

    Hello everyone,

    I am Mahesh Sherkar from India. I am working as Vice-Principal and Professor in Pharmaceutics at SVNHT’s College of Pharmacy, one of the leading college affiliated to Pune University. Apart from teaching we do research by developing novel drug delivery systems. In 2010 accidentally I saw AVAC site and started research on HIV by developing antiviral loaded nanoparticle dispersed vaginal gel. We worked in the past up to animal study (preclinical) I think and believes that GPP principles are important.

    About GPP, I heard first time at HIV R4P 2014, Cape Town conference, and tried to join from first batch. Thanks Jessica, Anne to give me opportunity to join GPP course this time and award me honored to became a classmate of such wonderful friends.

    I am happy, excited, and little bit nervous about course, because first time I am doing online course

    Thank you

    Mahesh

    in reply to: Community Represantation #4430

    Hello everyone,

    Very nice discussion on CAB/CAG. I am so much encouraged. I agree with Mark’s and Jessica’s comment Most important is group function, I also agree with Bamidele that through meeting every issues should be sorted to reduce the attrition and promote synergy between CAB and community.

    Thank you

    Mahesh

    in reply to: Discussion Forum Posting Guidance_Please read! #4429

    Thank you Anne, Nice guidance

    in reply to: Discussion Forum Posting Guidance_Please read! #4428

    I read all the above information, saw module 0, I am so happy and excited about GPP course because I have never communicated with others by this way before. LMS is really best systems.

Viewing 10 replies - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)