Hi, Erikan
Module design was excellent. I was also fascinated by its interactive nature, it was well organised and exciting to follow. What I found very interesting was link between the module content, GPP guidelines and the operationalization of these guidelines into the GPP blue print. Work assignment were excellent because they allowed us to extend our thinking beyond the guidelines itself. I must also confess that the comments from the marked work assignments were excellent. In-terms of the discussion forums they have allowed us to keep contact with our fellow colleagues and establish networks with people common interest to us.
Aspects of the program that need to be improved:
- I feel that the time allocated to this course was not enough and I therefore would like to suggest that we increase the course duration to at least 6 months with each module given 2 weeks.
- We have submitted work assignment and we were given feedback which was good to read and follow. My feeling is that these feedback were not quantifiable enough for me to know where I need to improve. What I mean here is that it would have been good if we could be allocate a percentage to each assignment and work on the average percentage to determine the final mark.
- Since this is a web-based portal, can I suggest that we improve on internet connectivity. I agree with Jauhara, it was a mission to upload some of the assignments
Regards
John
