Think about the CAPRISA case study highlighted in the online training module for Lesson 9. How did their comprehensive approach contribute to their success and network of relationships created over time? What are some examples of how you have sustained relationships with communities after and between trials?
Their approach to engaging the community and stakeholders went well beyond trial related issues. This shows real interest in the well-being of the community and not only a one-sided need in trial matters. They made the effort to investigate the area’s social and cultural environment which ensured that it wasn’t a misguided effort. By doing this they built trust and mutual respect. And when it came to trial-related activities they followed the correct channels.
As resources in between trials sometimes limit a site to contribute and partake in non-trial related stakeholder activities, sites need to be very creative to be able to still keep stakeholders engaged. It is also important to remember that keeping a relationship healthy with stakeholders does not always have to mean with a monetary contribution, but the basic willingness to help out in manpower already makes a big difference. So where you can’t give money, give some of your time.
