[Kelvin]

Stakeholder retention for me ties in within a broader strategic plan of the CRS, which also relates to the
Very difficult to maintain stakeholder engagement within a environment where there is constant flux with studies coming in and closing down. It would benefit larger CRS sites which have multiple studies, but for a small site with say one or two studies, its a tall order. Also the institutional costs of maintaining a stakeholder retention, is higher to maintain in relation to one study, where the revenue stream is already burdenede, as opposed to a multiple site where institutional costs can be cross subsidised.